🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.